Atle Hamar, director of standards at Lottstift, said:
Kindred’s actions in Norway, in our opinion, are very aggressive. You can’t ignore the law and do what you want if you don’t agree with it. That’s a problem. In Norway, Kindred does not operate pcs. However, it provides a service market on the free coast of power using Irish machines.
Kindred’s position is similar to that of other countries after the US passed the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act in 2006. The seizure of its parent ship’s territory by the Justice Department in 2011—which the industry called Black Friday—did not go down well for them.
However, there are some significant differences between the conditions. The Norwegian government, for starters, has no level of influence from the US. Kindred, on the other hand, believes that Norway’s policy, which gives the government control over real money gambling, violates European Union (EEA) rules.
2019 saw the beginning of the conflict. Trannel was initially advised to stop operating in Norway by the Lottstift, which monitors and regulates all lotteries, lottery and public games, and other related matters.
Norwegians can still buy Trannel’s Bingo, Storspiller, Maria Casino, and Unibet brands. The conflict is still ongoing. Kindred Group has stated that the Norwegian system is legal because it is legal for Norwegians to obtain and participate in the return of the limit route, such as gaming.
In addition to fees, for Hamar, Kindred could also be subject to state regulatory benefits:
The U.S. regulator is aware of the situation, according to Westrell, and Kindred is not concerned about the consequences:
Every State Plays a Different Game
The Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB) has been told by Bally that it has used DGE standards to decide whether or not to enter the gray market. According to Kieckhefer:
It seems like a departure from Nevada is a pre-concept.
In other words, Ngcbs may not condone what Dge is about to do.
Why do you assume Norway’s rule is against the law, Brother?
The US has often argued the same thing. They have not, however, attempted to have their claims tried in American courts, unlike Kindred. We believe that Norway routinely violates the independence of EEA legislation for the benefit of Scandinavian federal citizens because it has not established a transparent licensing system and practices an unusually orderly betting policy.
Westrell argues for more:
Since there is no exclusive, visible registration procedure and no legal layer of activity for the authorities under EEA legislation, we believe that Norwegian tyranny will never be enforced. Norway is being pressured by its peers to emulate Sweden and the Netherlands.
Norway has made a point and emphasized its obligations to the public. Hamar further reports:
Data shows that activities regulated by Norway have fewer problems related to betting than those that are not. To continue our fight to reduce losses caused by สล็อต gambling, we want to eliminate all forms of underhanded donor gambling in our country.
He also shared examples of Sweden and the Netherlands. He claimed that today’s gacor slots are countries that practice transparent and without discrimination of policy registration. Westrell explained that they are demanding a concept in Norway.…